MCP Boundary

Blocks MCP tool calls with reasons the agent can act on

AIlive
Visit site ↗First seen 6d ago · 1 platform
The takewhere this launch stands, in one glance
Still shipping?
Live, but nothing has shipped since we started watching — fade clock at 3/28.
Is it overpriced?
Priced at the anchor — no crowd premium. What you see is what the signals say.
Where did it land?
Strongest on PeerPush — placed #475.
Reality anchor
1,055 (0% since IPO)
Market price
1,055
Checked
Jul 16
Market priceREPRICED DAILY
1,055
▲ +0.5%
7-day
+0.1% today

Hype can't move this line. Only verifiable outcomes do.

Will it still be moving in 4 weeks?

No money. No seat. It doesn't move the price. It goes on your record — and in 28 days reality settles it.

Key stats
MRRNot connected
SectorAI
Since IPO
0.5%
the reality anchor is climbing
Fade clock
3 of 28 silent days
Price, last 90d
only verifiable outcomes move this line
Where it stands
Bigger than 95% of live launchesof 7,286

by reality anchor — the price money can't pump

Strongest on PeerPush at #475
The story

AI. Launched 6d ago on PeerPush, where it placed #475. Today, it's live, but nothing on the site has changed since we started watching. It's anchored at 1,055 pts.

Why 1,055 points?REALITY PRICE

It placed #475 on PeerPush with 12 votes.

A launch's opening price comes from where it placed on its own board, normalised across all 12 platforms we watch. That's deliberate: #1 on a small board beats #40 on a huge one. It's how a launch nobody saw can still be worth more than one everybody did.

Backing it does not move the price.

No matter how much money goes in. There is no pump here — you can't make yourself right by buying more. The line only moves on things that actually happened: an award, revenue that grew, a new platform, code that shipped — or silence.

Is it still shipping?WE CHECK THE SITE DAILY
SiteLive
read 8h ago
Last shippedNo change yet
no change detected since we started watching
Fade clock3 of 28 days silent
day 7 · bleeding startsday 28 · marked faded

Quiet for 3 days — no penalty yet. Bleeding begins on day 7.

We fetch this site every day and hash what's on it. A founder can post “still working on it” — but if they actually shipped, the page changes. That's the only claim we price: evidence, not announcements. The real question isn't “will this be huge?” — it's “will they still be moving in four weeks?”

The story so farEVERY MOVE, AND WHY
Jul 161,055+0.1%Went quiet — bleeding
Jul 151,054+0.1%Went quiet — bleeding
Jul 141,053+0.1%Went quiet — bleeding
Jul 101,050IPOOpened on the board

1 quiet day in between are left out — nothing happened on them. Repriced every day, no cliffs. A launch that goes quiet bleeds a little at a time, so there's never a drop you could have run from the night before.

Momentum on its boardDOESN'T MOVE THE PRICE

Daily tracking just started for this launch — the first point is on the board. A second reading lands with tomorrow's run, and the curve builds from there.

How the launch is moving on its own board, day by day. This is the crowd's attention — it does not move the reality price. Only verifiable outcomes do.
A flat line is normal: votes stop within a day or two of launch, on every board. What's unusual — and what actually counts — is a launch that keeps pulling votes long after its day is over.

About

MCP Boundary is a local checkpoint between your AI agent - for example Claude Desktop - and the MCP tools it uses. You write the rules; Boundary checks each routed call against them before it runs. Nothing here is automatic - it does what your policy says. The point is not just to say no. When Boundary blocks a call, it sends back a short, machine-readable reason the agent can use, so the agent can adjust the request instead of failing or retrying blindly. Two things make that useful. State-aware writes. One rule you can set is to tie a write to the data the agent read first. Then, if that data changed in the meantime, Boundary stops the write and tells the agent to read again before acting. A valid call is not always a safe outcome. Clear feedback, and human approval when it matters. A block is not a dead end. The reason can be specific - for example, which email recipients were rejected, so the agent can retry without them. And for a call that needs a person's OK, nothing runs: the agent gets a clear "waiting for approval" answer and pauses, while a human approves or rejects the exact action in the local dashboard. Only an approved follow-up call goes through. Your rules can reach into the details of a call, not just its name: which recipients are allowed, which values are permitted, how much data can come back, how often a call may repeat. Every checked call - the decision, the reason, the result - lands in a local activity view, so you can see what the agent tried and why it was allowed or blocked. It all runs on your machine. The agent sees the tools, never the passwords or tokens behind them, and nothing is sent back to us. About prompt injection: Boundary does not try to detect a jailbreak or a poisoned instruction. It works one layer lower. Even if the model is tricked, routed calls can still only do what your policy allows - so a risky send, write, or delete that your policy blocks stays blocked, or waits for a human, no matter why the agent asked. Honest scope: Boundary only checks calls that actually run through it. It does not vouch for what an MCP server does inside, and it is a local tool for developers and operators — not a hosted security gateway or a data-loss filter.

Where it launched1 PLATFORM
PlatformVotesCounts toward priceLink
PeerPush12sets the price

The board it did beston sets the price. Every other board only adds to it if the launch also landed in that board's top 25% — because just showing up somewhere isn't an achievement. Listing on twelve directories is free; placing well on them isn't.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to post.

No thesis posted yet. Be the first.