Learnaway
Detect AI and copy-pasted homework via writing behavior
Hype can't move this line. Only verifiable outcomes do.
No money. No seat. It doesn't move the price. It goes on your record — and in 28 days reality settles it.
by reality anchor — the price money can't pump
Other. Launched 6d ago on PeerPush, where it placed #506. Today, it's live, but nothing on the site has changed since we started watching. It's anchored at 150 pts.
It placed #506 on PeerPush with 2 votes.
A launch's opening price comes from where it placed on its own board, normalised across all 12 platforms we watch. That's deliberate: #1 on a small board beats #40 on a huge one. It's how a launch nobody saw can still be worth more than one everybody did.
No matter how much money goes in. There is no pump here — you can't make yourself right by buying more. The line only moves on things that actually happened: an award, revenue that grew, a new platform, code that shipped — or silence.
Quiet for 3 days — no penalty yet. Bleeding begins on day 7.
We fetch this site every day and hash what's on it. A founder can post “still working on it” — but if they actually shipped, the page changes. That's the only claim we price: evidence, not announcements. The real question isn't “will this be huge?” — it's “will they still be moving in four weeks?”
The story so farEVERY MOVE, AND WHY▾
1 quiet day in between are left out — nothing happened on them. Repriced every day, no cliffs. A launch that goes quiet bleeds a little at a time, so there's never a drop you could have run from the night before.
Momentum on its boardDOESN'T MOVE THE PRICE▾
How the launch is moving on its own board, day by day. This is the crowd's attention — it does not move the reality price. Only verifiable outcomes do.
A flat line is normal: votes stop within a day or two of launch, on every board. What's unusual — and what actually counts — is a launch that keeps pulling votes long after its day is over.
About
Ive been trying to solve the problem of catching improper AI use with homework. Recently came to the realisation that AI models are increasingly becoming so effective that text scanning tools cannot be trusted. Learnaway monitors the student writing process to provide educators with signals regarding homework integrity. By analyzing typing rhythm, timing, and paste behavior, the tool identifies likely AI-generated or copy-pasted content. Designed as a support tool for teachers rather than an automated verdict system, it highlights discrepancies in how a document was created. Tools like Turnitin and GPTZero infer authorship from writing style alone. They can't see who wrote what, so they flag honest students and wave real AI essays straight through. The people who study them, and the universities that bought them, are walking away. Learnaway judges the writing processinstead of the prose: a single large paste, a robotic typing rhythm, a 600-word essay submitted in three minutes. These signals are concrete, explainable, and far harder to dispute, and they don't penalise the way a student happens to write. Up to 200 submissions a month for your whole school, free. No card, no setup, no training required.
Where it launched1 PLATFORM▾
| Platform | Votes | Counts toward price | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PeerPush | 2 | sets the price | ↗ |
The board it did beston sets the price. Every other board only adds to it if the launch also landed in that board's top 25% — because just showing up somewhere isn't an achievement. Listing on twelve directories is free; placing well on them isn't.