Hype can't move this line. Only verifiable outcomes do.
No money. No seat. It doesn't move the price. It goes on your record — and in 28 days reality settles it.
by reality anchor — the price money can't pump
Dev. Launched 6d ago on PeerPush, where it placed #562. Today, the site itself changed 8h ago — evidence it's still shipping, not just announcing. It's anchored at 1,716 pts.
It placed #562 on PeerPush with 22 votes.
A launch's opening price comes from where it placed on its own board, normalised across all 12 platforms we watch. That's deliberate: #1 on a small board beats #40 on a huge one. It's how a launch nobody saw can still be worth more than one everybody did.
No matter how much money goes in. There is no pump here — you can't make yourself right by buying more. The line only moves on things that actually happened: an award, revenue that grew, a new platform, code that shipped — or silence.
Moving right now. The clock only starts when a launch goes quiet.
We fetch this site every day and hash what's on it. A founder can post “still working on it” — but if they actually shipped, the page changes. That's the only claim we price: evidence, not announcements. The real question isn't “will this be huge?” — it's “will they still be moving in four weeks?”
The story so farEVERY MOVE, AND WHY▾
2 quiet days in between are left out — nothing happened on them. Repriced every day, no cliffs. A launch that goes quiet bleeds a little at a time, so there's never a drop you could have run from the night before.
Momentum on its boardDOESN'T MOVE THE PRICE▾
How the launch is moving on its own board, day by day. This is the crowd's attention — it does not move the reality price. Only verifiable outcomes do.
A flat line is normal: votes stop within a day or two of launch, on every board. What's unusual — and what actually counts — is a launch that keeps pulling votes long after its day is over.
About
Atlarix is a desktop AI coding harness built from the ground up for open-weight frontier models — DeepSeek, Qwen (Alibaba), Kimi (Moonshot), and MiniMax — instead of treating them as an afterthought behind a Claude/GPT-first UX. Most harnesses "support" open-weight models the way a universal remote supports your TV: technically works, never quite right. Atlarix is built the other way around. The core of that is Blueprint — a structural + lexical code-retrieval engine with no embeddings, no vector DB, no reranker step. It builds a real dependency graph of your codebase and hands the model a structurally-grounded context window instead of a nearest-neighbor guess. That matters most on exactly the models Atlarix targets: weaker context discipline and shorter effective reasoning windows than the frontier closed models, so retrieval quality is the difference between a model that's genuinely useful and one that hallucinates around gaps. Bring your own model, or run fully local. Use your own DeepSeek/Qwen key, run offline with Ollama or LM Studio, or top up pay-as-you-go credits and let Atlarix handle the model for you. The harness is the product — inference is always your choice, never locked in. What you get: - Five-mode workflow — Ask / Plan / Build / Debug / Review — so the model's autonomy matches the task, not the other way around - Approval-first execution — "AI that asks before it acts": every write, every terminal command, every MCP tool call routes through a real permission gate, not a checkbox you disable on day one - Real per-model context windows — no generic 128k assumption slapped on every provider - Automations — cron / GitHub-poll / MCP-poll triggers for unattended runs, with dangerous operations always denied and a hard execution budget - MCP support with OAuth (PKCE), tool descriptions treated as untrusted input, and a live consent gate — built by someone who's spent real time on the adversarial side of "AI agent with shell access" - Voice-to-text built in — talk to your codebase, free and local via Whisper 137 MB download — leaner than you'd expect from Electron, without cutting features Atlarix is built solo by one engineer (me) under NorahLabs, out of Nairobi. It's not venture-backed, it's not trying to be the biggest — it's trying to be the most honest, best-built option for developers who've picked their models on cost, sovereignty, or capability grounds and want a harness that actually respects that choice instead of quietly nudging them back to closed models.
Where it launched1 PLATFORM▾
| Platform | Votes | Counts toward price | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PeerPush | 22 | sets the price | ↗ |
The board it did beston sets the price. Every other board only adds to it if the launch also landed in that board's top 25% — because just showing up somewhere isn't an achievement. Listing on twelve directories is free; placing well on them isn't.