
AgentX-Ray
The evolving adversarial gauntlet test for any AI.
Hype can't move this line. Only verifiable outcomes do.
No money. No seat. It doesn't move the price. It goes on your record — and in 28 days reality settles it.
by reality anchor — the price money can't pump
AI. Launched 1d ago on PeerPush, where it placed #121. Today, it's live, but nothing on the site has changed since we started watching. It's anchored at 60 pts.
It placed #121 on PeerPush with 3 votes.
A launch's opening price comes from where it placed on its own board, normalised across all 12 platforms we watch. That's deliberate: #1 on a small board beats #40 on a huge one. It's how a launch nobody saw can still be worth more than one everybody did.
No matter how much money goes in. There is no pump here — you can't make yourself right by buying more. The line only moves on things that actually happened: an award, revenue that grew, a new platform, code that shipped — or silence.
Quiet for 1 day — no penalty yet. Bleeding begins on day 7.
We fetch this site every day and hash what's on it. A founder can post “still working on it” — but if they actually shipped, the page changes. That's the only claim we price: evidence, not announcements. The real question isn't “will this be huge?” — it's “will they still be moving in four weeks?”
The story so farEVERY MOVE, AND WHY▾
Repriced every day, no cliffs. A launch that goes quiet bleeds a little at a time, so there's never a drop you could have run from the night before.
Momentum on its boardDOESN'T MOVE THE PRICE▾
How the launch is moving on its own board, day by day. This is the crowd's attention — it does not move the reality price. Only verifiable outcomes do.
A flat line is normal: votes stop within a day or two of launch, on every board. What's unusual — and what actually counts — is a launch that keeps pulling votes long after its day is over.
About
The problem with AI benchmarks is that they're static. If a test never changes, models eventually memorize the answer key. Labs optimize for the leaderboard. Scores inflate. You ship a model into production expecting GPT-4-level reasoning and get something that hallucinates under pressure, drops context mid-task, and fails the moment the environment doesn't match training. The benchmarks said it was ready. Your users found out it wasn't. AgentX-Ray is an adversarial gauntlet built to fix the trust problem. Instead of running static strings against a fixed test suite, AgentX-Ray generates a dynamic environment on every run — injecting unique variables, shifting context mid-task, and forcing models to reason in real time without a safety net. No two runs are identical. There's no answer key to memorize. There's no leaderboard padding. Just raw, ungameable performance data so you know exactly what a model can handle before you bet your product on it. How it works Each run pushes a model through a structured gauntlet of phases — from meta-reasoning and instruction following to multi-step planning, edge case handling, and output precision under adversarial conditions. Every phase is scored independently so you can see not just how a model performs overall, but exactly where it breaks. Phase scores are aggregated into a single composite score. You can drill into any model's phase breakdown, compare runs across time, and watch for score drift — the quiet killer that happens when a model update degrades a capability you were depending on. The leaderboard AgentX-Ray maintains a live global leaderboard of frontier model performance. Official rankings are built from verified runs — benchmarks we run ourselves under controlled conditions, so the leaderboard can't be manipulated by cherry-picked submissions. Community runs sit alongside them for comparison, but verified scores are the canonical record. Current leaderboard includes Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Llama, and more — updated continuously as new models release and existing ones drift. Bring your own API key AgentX-Ray is BYOK — bring your own API key and run the gauntlet against any model you have access to. Your results are yours. You can keep them private, submit them to the community leaderboard, or use them internally to make deployment decisions with actual evidence behind them. Who it's for - AI engineers who need to compare models before committing to an integration - Startups evaluating which frontier model to build their product on - Enterprise teams running internal model governance and performance tracking - Researchers who need reproducible, adversarial benchmarks that can't be gamed - Anyone who's been burned by a benchmark score that didn't survive contact with real users Why it matters now Every major lab releases new models monthly. Every release claims state-of-the-art performance. Every benchmark shows improvement. And yet production failures keep happening because the benchmarks measure what models practiced, not what they can actually do. AgentX-Ray exists because trust in AI performance has to be earned with evidence — not inherited from a leaderboard someone else built for their own model. Run the gauntlet. See where your model breaks before your users do.
Where it launched1 PLATFORM▾
| Platform | Votes | Counts toward price | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PeerPush | 3 | sets the price | ↗ |
The board it did beston sets the price. Every other board only adds to it if the launch also landed in that board's top 25% — because just showing up somewhere isn't an achievement. Listing on twelve directories is free; placing well on them isn't.